For early bilingual children who stutter with high L2 exposure, assessing stuttering severity in one language may be sufficient.

Reactivity-regulation interplay shapes stuttering impact, especially in older children.

In a large study of 8,518 adults aged 55-80, self-perceived stuttering (3.3% of men, 1.9% of women) was robustly linked to reduced social participation, even after accounting for key influencing factors.

The impact that stuttering has on a child can be predicted to some degree by their temperament, level of anxiety and depression, age and overt stuttering, but not sex.

Children’s disfluencies were driven mainly by task‑related cognitive load rather than attention or language dominance, with attention showing only limited influence in bilingual speakers.

Attention and EFs, particularly inhibitory control and working memory, influence speech fluency across populations.

Adults with ASD exhibit increased stuttering-like disfluencies and word-final disfluencies in spontaneous speech, but not during reading.

Book chapter on treatment of fluency disorders and prognostic aspects

Stuttering impacts nonlinguistic, nonauditory alerting and executive attention in bilingual stuttering adults.

Multilinguals show similar disfluency types, but stuttering frequency and language dominance effects differ significantly.

Stuttering assessment in bilinguals needs detailed, language-specific analysis to prevent misdiagnosis.

This chapter discusses the basic aspects of the assessment of stuttering.

This chapter discusses widely-used psychological approaches in stuttering treatment.

How do young children regulate emotions? A new Dutch questionnaire provides answers.

Bilingual children’s disfluencies complicate accurate stuttering diagnosis; misdiagnosis risks persist.

Stuttering linked to inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and speech disfluencies.

Early intervention by specialists improves outcomes for children who stutter.

Autistic individuals show more disfluencies; cognitive, linguistic factors influence speech.

Comparing effectiveness of Mini-KIDS, SCBT, and Lidcombe for stuttering treatment.

Bilingual stuttering children show higher disfluency; differential diagnosis is possible.

Reactivity and anxiety linked to disfluency in controls, not autism.

Disfluencies influenced by cognition, syntax, and sex; impacts differ in autism.

Reduced inhibitory control or cognitive flexibility contribute to more stuttering-like disfluencies.

Attention abilities of stuttering and non-stuttering multilinguals are similar.

Early referral to a stutter therapist is key.

Stuttering children show higher frustration, linked to longer disfluencies and physical behaviors.

Severe stuttering linked to reduced inhibition; further research needed.

Bilingual children who not stutter misdiagnosed due to frequent disfluencies.

SLP treatment choice for stuttering influenced by child, family, evidence.

This chapter explores improving fluency clinicians' effectiveness and specialist education.

Varying views on addressing stuttering's mental impact with parents.

Resources aid early stuttering identification, referral, and specialist-guided treatment decisions.

Stuttering misidentified in multilinguals; judgments influenced by sample characteristics.

“Clinical Cases in Dysfluency" explores assessment, management, and reflective practice.

Autistic young adults' disfluencies exceed controls; broad evaluation recommended.

Focus on why treatments work, not which is the best approach.

CampDSL builds resilience, boosts confidence, reduces stuttering's daily impact.

Children who stutter face more challenges with response inhibition and flexibility.

Older stuttering children are slower, make more errors, indicating cognitive flexibility's role.

Reactivity and self-regulation link to anxiety, depression in children who stutter

Temperament and emotion influence developmental stuttering’s onset, persistence, and impact.

Temperament and emotional processes stuttering, and clinical implications.

Early linguistic skills, temperament, and family history of stuttering predict fluency development.

Temperament, self-regulation, and executive functioning play a role in stuttering.

Bilingualism may increase disfluencies, complicating stuttering diagnosis in children.

Finnish KiddyCAT and BigCAT differentiate stuttering individuals from fluent speakers.

How to assess stuttering in clients.

This chapter explores improving fluency clinicians' effectiveness and specialist education.

Child-reported temperament affects stuttering impact

Different guidelines might be needed to distinguish disfluency from stuttering across languages.

Bilingual Yiddish-Dutch children have more disfluencies, challenging monolingual stuttering guidelines

Studies often misapply monolingual stuttering guidelines to multilingual individuals.

Bilingual children show higher rates of disfluencies; monolingual guidelines are inappropriate

Stuttering therapy varies by region: Flanders focuses more on stuttering modification.

Stuttering therapy varies by region: Flanders focuses more on stuttering modification.

No Purdue Pegboard differences found between stuttering and non-stuttering individuals

Children who stutter show distinct temperament and executive functioning profiles.

Children who stutter score lower on executive functions, indicating their possible role in the development of stuttering.

Children who stutter perform similarly to non-stuttering children on exogenous inhibition

Sex influences the type of disfluencies, age influences frequency and type.

Children who stutter exhibit distinct temperament and executive functioning differences.

Comparative study of phonological skills in children who stutter and children who do not stutter

Children with Down syndrome stutter more, showing unique disfluency patterns

Children who stutter show reduced accuracy in attentional shifting, inhibitory control

Children who stutter showed atypical central auditory discrimination, but typical sound encoding.

ECSF participants express high satisfaction, impacting professional development positively.

CWS, as a group, were less able to inhibit prepotent response tendencies.

Temperament and stuttering linked: attention, inhibitory control, and self-regulation differences.

Some attentional processes were less efficient in children who stutter.

Adults who stuttered showed, as a group, reduced response inhibition.

This paper outlines ECSF development and key decision-making processes.

Children who stutter scored lower on effortful control, higher on negative affectivity.

Chapter on stuttering diagnosis, behavioral therapy, parent and teacher guidance.

Chapter on phenomenology, etiology, and treatment of stuttering.

Underlying temperament structure is similar in stuttering, control, and voice-disordered children.